Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Hayes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Hayes Anchor | green | “that exculpatory evidence was improperly withheld from him” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Davis | green | “responses to county court's inquiries were sufficient to establish both his guilt and that the plea as a whole was knowing, intelligent and voluntary” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Hicks | green | “the record establishes that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as a condition of the plea bargain” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Williams | green | “plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Mitchell | green | “encompasses his challenges to the court's suppression rulings” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.