Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-Sanchez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-Sanchez Anchor | green | “if defendant had invoked his right to remain silent in response to miranda warnings, questioning that asked why certain information had not been revealed would have been improper.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. George Horacio Lorenzo | green | “it was thus not error to allow testimony as to that event.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. George Horacio Lorenzo | green | “either a total or a selective revocation of the defendant's earlier waiver of his fifth amendment rights.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-Sanchez | green | “did not remain silent in response to miranda warnings,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.