Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. James "Jamie" Douglas, Martin L. "Marty" Pruitt, Leon Mason, and James Anderson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. James "Jamie" Douglas, Martin L. "Marty" Pruitt, Leon Mason, and James Anderson Anchor | green | “the defendant proposes a correct statement of the law; the defendant's theory is supported by the evidence; the defendant's theory of defense is not part of the charge; and the failure to include an instruction on the defendant's theory of defense in the jury charge would deny t…” | 10 |
| 2 | United States v. Marshall Ray Marks, John D. Taylor, William J. Campbell, and Thomas E. Pals | green | “one who buys from a conspirator for resale is a member of the conspiracy if he knows at least its general aims” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.