Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Great Western Mortgage Corporation v. Michele Peacock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Great Western Mortgage Corporation v. Michele Peacock Anchor | green | “once a dispute is determined to be validly arbitrable, all other issues are to be decided at arbitration.” | 6 |
| 2 | Itt Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Amerishare Investors, Inc. | green | “when a party moves to compel arbitration, our role is to determine whether there is an agreement between those parties which commits the subject matter of the dispute to arbitration.” | 5 |
| 3 | Coddington Enterprises, Inc. v. Werries | green | “reliance on any misrepresentations or omissions by fleming as to the arbitration clauses was unreasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.