Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ruben Lopez-Gonzalez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ruben Lopez-Gonzalez Anchor | green | “any reference in law to an order of removal shall be deemed to include a reference to an order of exclusion and deportation or an order of deportation.” | 4 |
| 2 | Pierrot Bejjani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States | red | “expands the types of orders subject to reinstatement, provides that the prior order of removal is not subject to being reopened or reviewed, and bars aliens from applying for any form of relief, other than a claim for asylum.” | 4 |
| 3 | Carlos Perez v. Kenneth J. Elwood, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “the court should presume that the legislation does not apply to the conduct in question, and apply it only prospectively.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ruben Gomez-Chavez v. Brian Perryman, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date and is not subject to being reopened or reviewed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.