Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 194 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kreschollek v. Southern Stevedoring Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kreschollek v. Southern Stevedoring Co. Anchor | green | “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 87 |
| 2 | Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc | red | “a nonmoving party has created a genuine issue of material fact if it has provided sufficient evidence to allow a jury to find in its favor at trial.” | 72 |
| 3 | Anchorage Associates v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review | green | “is not alone a sufficient basis for the entry of a summary judgment.” | 35 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.