Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Epstein v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epstein v. State Anchor | green | “it is presumed that the legislature in enacting a statute did not intend an absurdity, and such a result will be avoided if the terms of the statute admit of it by a reasonable construction.” | 9 |
| 2 | Mooney v. Sneed | green | “the reasonableness of a statute may not be questioned by a court, and a court may not substitute its own policy judgments for those of the legislature.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.