Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation District Anchor | green | “the award of attorneys' fees in declaratory judgment actions is clearly within the trial court's discretion and is not dependent on a finding that a party 'substantially prevailed.” | 10 |
| 2 | City of Corpus Christi v. Public Utility Commission of Texas | green | “appellate jurisdiction of any issue, it acquires 'extended jurisdiction' of all other questions of law properly preserved and presented.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.