Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 188 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins Anchor | green | “because age and years of service are analytically distinct, an employer can take account of one while ignoring the other, and thus it is incorrect to say that a decision based on years of service is necessarily 'age based.” | 82 |
| 2 | Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc. | green | “circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, is proof that does not on its face establish discriminatory animus, but does allow a factfinder to draw a reasonable inference that discrimination occurred.” | 56 |
| 3 | Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc. | green | “direct evidence of discrimination is that evidence which, if believed, requires the conclusion that unlawful discrimination was at least a motivating factor in the employer's actions.” | 50 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.