Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Von Raab v. Von Raab.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Von Raab v. Von Raab Anchor | green | “if the party claiming a separate interest in the transmuted property proves retraceability, the burden shifts to the other party to prove that the transmutation of the separate property resulted from a 'gift.” | 7 |
| 2 | Theismann v. Theismann | green | “no presumption of gift arises from the fact that the property was retitled.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.