Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 184 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilson v. Taylor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson v. Taylor Anchor | green | “it is not sufficient for a party simply to announce a position or assert an error and then leave it up to this court to discover and rationalize the basis for his claims, or unravel and elaborate for him his arguments, and then search for authority either to sustain or reject hi…” | 93 |
| 2 | Houghton v. Keller | green | “an appellant's failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue.” | 42 |
| 3 | Associated Builders and Contractors v. City of Lansing | green | “except where those decisions have clearly been overruled or superseded.” | 20 |
| 4 | Zine v. Chrysler Corp. | green | “prohibits the use of unfair, unconscionable, or deceptive methods, acts, or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce.” | 10 |
| 5 | PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance Services | green | “this court will not reverse a trial court's decision regarding leave to amend unless it constituted an abuse of that discretion that resulted in injustice.” | 8 |
| 6 | Hughes v. Region VII Area Agency on Aging | green | “where, as here, the trial court considered material outside the pleadings, this court will construe the motion as having been granted pursuant to mcr 2.116(c)(10).” | 7 |
| 7 | Grist v. the Upjohn Company | green | “amendment that adds a claim or defense relates back to the date of the original pleading if the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth, or attempted to be set forth, in the original pleading.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.