Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Noguel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Noguel Anchor | green | “it is well settled that defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to 'make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of success” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Hudy | red | “logically be linked to any specific material issue in the case” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Peterson | green | “pursuing parole-related objectives” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. DePonceau | green | “conducted the requisite searching inquiry to insure that defendant's request to proceed pro se was accompanied by a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Anderson | green | “there was sufficient evidence at the suppression hearing to establish probable cause for the arrest independent of the confidential informant's statements” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.