Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co. Anchor | green | “disqualification, as a prophylactic device for protecting the attorney-client relationship, is a drastic measure which courts should hesitate to impose except when absolutely necessary.” | 6 |
| 2 | Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. Stephens | green | “specific institutional mechanisms” | 5 |
| 3 | Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co. | green | “drastic measure which courts should hesitate to impose except when absolutely necessary.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.