Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from K.P. v. LeBlanc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.P. v. LeBlanc Anchor | green | “an injury-in-fact caused by a defendant's challenged conduct that is redressable by a court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Pace v. Bogalusa City School Board | green | “in the most general sense, the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine examines the extent to which government benefits may be conditioned or distributed in ways that burden constitutional rights or principles.” | 4 |
| 3 | Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Supreme Court of Louisiana | green | “likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable decision will redress the plaintiffs injury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.