Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Anthony Darrell Lesina.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Anthony Darrell Lesina Anchor | green | “a defendant is entitled to an instruction upon his theory of the case if the record contains evidentiary support for the theory and the theory is supported by law.” | 5 |
| 2 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald HOUSER, Defendant-Appellant | green | “to kill with malice aforethought means to kill either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Pineda-Doval | green | “a very high degree of risk of injury to other persons” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.