Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 180 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Snow v. E.K. McDaniel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Snow v. E.K. McDaniel Anchor | red | “a difference of opinion between a physician and the prisoner-or between medical professionals-concerning what medical care is appropriate does not amount to deliberate indifference.” | 99 |
| 2 | John Colwell v. Robert Bannister | green | “in order to prevail on a claim under the eighth amendment for inadequate medical care, a plaintiff must show 'deliberate indifference' to his 'serious medical needs.” | 37 |
| 3 | Lemire v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation | green | “even gross negligence is insufficient to establish deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” | 23 |
| 4 | Ana Sandoval v. County of San Diego | green | “individuals in state custody have a constitutional right to adequate medical treatment.” | 21 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.