Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Com..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Com. Anchor | green | “the failure to timely file the transcript . . . did not deprive the court of appeals of its active jurisdiction to proceed to judgment in the appeal,” | 6 |
| 2 | Neima Bormey v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “that ssi benefits be paid only to the extent an individual's minimum income level is not being met from other sources.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bennett v. COM., DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES | green | “not entitled to a credit or reduction in his child support obligation as a result of the ssi benefits the mother received for the adult child's disability,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.