Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 179 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Murray.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Murray Anchor | red | “given the fact that the pcra's timeliness requirements are mandatory and jurisdictional in nature, no court may properly disregard or alter them in order to reach the merits of the claims raised in a pcra petition that is filed in an untimely manner” | 71 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. McKeever | green | “any pcra petition, including a second or subsequent petition, be filed within one year of the date that the petitioner's judgment of sentence becomes final, unless the petitioner pleads and proves that one of the three exceptions to the timeliness requirement . . . is applicable.” | 52 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Liebel | green | “review an order granting or denying pcra relief to determine whether the pcra court's decision is supported by evidence of record and whether its decision is free from legal error.” | 28 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Stokes | green | “plead and prove that the information on which he relies could not have been obtained earlier, despite the exercise of due diligence.” | 28 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.