Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buncombe County Ex Rel. Andres v. Newburn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buncombe County Ex Rel. Andres v. Newburn Anchor | green | “a change in an order is considered substantive and outside the boundaries of rule 60(a) when it alters the effect of the original order.” | 10 |
| 2 | Thacker v. Thacker | green | “although section (6) of rule 60(b) has often been termed 'a vast reservoir of equitable power,' a court cannot set aside a judgment pursuant to this rule without a showing (1) that extraordinary circumstances exist and (2) that justice demands relief.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.