Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 178 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Glover v. Austin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glover v. Austin Anchor | green | “summary judgment is appropriate if, but only if, there are no genuine issues of material fact supporting an essential element of the plaintiffs' claim for relief.” | 52 |
| 2 | Pimentel v. City of New York | green | “failed to raise an issue of material fact with respect to an essential element of her claim, the district court properly granted summary judgment dismissing that claim” | 50 |
| 3 | Roe v. City of Waterbury | green | “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 35 |
| 4 | Wali v. One Source Co. | green | “where a pro se plaintiff fails to submit a proper rule 56.1 statement in opposition to a summary judgment motion, the court retains some discretion to consider the substance of the plaintiff's arguments, where actually supported by evidentiary submissions.” | 31 |
| 5 | Porter v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | green | “while the court is required to review the record as a whole, it must disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury is not required to believe.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.