Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krohe v. City of Bloomington.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krohe v. City of Bloomington Anchor | green | “and what this does is that it provides that for full-time law enforcement officers and firefighters that are killed or disabled in the line of duty shall continue the health benefits for the officer or the firefighter, their spouses and their children.” | 3 |
| 2 | Krohe v. City of Bloomington | green | “in light of this unambiguous legislative history, and in light of section 10(a)'s facial ambiguity, we will defer to the legislature's judgment.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bremer v. City of Rockford | green | “that the legislature did not intend the phrase 'catastrophic injury' in section 10(a) of the act to be synonymous with a disease resulting in the award of an occupational disease disability pension as defined by section 4-110.1 of the pension code” | 3 |
| 4 | Roberts v. Alexandria Transportation, Inc. | green | “all other rules of statutory construction are subordinate to this cardinal principle.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.