Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mullen v. Bureau of Prisons.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mullen v. Bureau of Prisons Anchor | green | “the united states has not consented to be sued for monetary damages based on a constitutional violation.” | 6 |
| 2 | Boling v. U.S. Parole Comm'n | green | “first, the law is well established that congress has not waived the united states' immunity with respect to tort claims arising under the constitution.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.