Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yosemite Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yosemite Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission Anchor | green | “includes every charge upon persons or property, imposed by or under the authority of the legislature, for public purposes” | 4 |
| 2 | Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara | green | “any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government” | 4 |
| 3 | Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir | green | “the new water rates are the product of a newly formulated set of policies that implemented a new set of choices: to replace a 105-year-old water storage tank as well as selected old water mains. the plan also represents policy choices about how to allocate the new infrastructure…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.