2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger Anchor | green | “exhaustion of administrative remedies is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a civil action alleging violations of the chra” | 5 |
| 2 | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Loutzenhiser | red | “a requirement of presentment merely gives a governmental unit an opportunity to decide for itself whether to pay a claim.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.