Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Polar Shipping Ltd. v. Oriental Shipping Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polar Shipping Ltd. v. Oriental Shipping Corp. Anchor | green | “a ship may be here today and gone tomorrow, not to return for an indefinite period, perhaps never.” | 5 |
| 2 | Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241 | green | “under the prevailing rule, the release or removal of the res from the control of the court will terminate jurisdiction, unless the res is released accidentally, fraudulently, or improperly.” | 4 |
| 3 | Martin v. The Bud | green | “no supersedeas bond was filed, nor was any stay of execution obtained.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.