Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert C. Schmidt v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 949.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert C. Schmidt v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 949 Anchor | green | “must offer 'evidence of fraud, deceitful action or dishonest conduct' by the union.” | 6 |
| 2 | Stevens v. Highway, City & Air Freight Drivers, Dockmen, & Helpers Local Union No. 600 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America | green | “mere negligence, poor judgment, or ineptitude on the part of the union is insufficient to establish a breach of the duty of fair representation.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.