Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wall Data Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wall Data Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Anchor | green | “we review a district court's formulation of civil jury instructions for an abuse of discretion,” | 6 |
| 2 | Jana L. Morton v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | red | “a very narrow permission to employers to exclude individuals with disabilities not for reasons related to performance of their jobs, but because their mere presence would endanger others with whom they work and whom they serve.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.