Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roxie Hollon, on Behalf of Joseph W. Hollon v. Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roxie Hollon, on Behalf of Joseph W. Hollon v. Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “this challenge warrants little discussion, as hollon has made little effort to develop this argument in her brief on appeal, or to identify any specific aspects of the commissioner's determination that lack support in the record.” | 6 |
| 2 | Stevens v. Astrue | green | “evidence submitted in the first instance to the district court may only be considered in determining whether remand is appropriate pursuant to sentence six of 42 u.s.c. 405 (g).” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.