Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 173 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc. Anchor | green | “threatened loss or damage 'of the type the antitrust laws were designed to prevent and that flows from that which makes defendants' acts unlawful.” | 70 |
| 2 | Brown Shoe Co. v. United States | green | “the protection of competition, not competitors.” | 54 |
| 3 | Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. | green | “a significant threat of injury from an impending violation of the antitrust laws or from a contemporary violation likely to continue or recur.” | 49 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.