Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McPheters v. Maile.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McPheters v. Maile Anchor | green | “if reasonable persons could reach differing conclusions or draw conflicting inferences from the evidence presented.” | 8 |
| 2 | Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. Ernest | green | “will construe the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment, drawing all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.