Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 168 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. Anchor | green | “because the adea prohibits discrimination on the basis of age and not class membership, the fact that a replacement is substantially younger than the plaintiff is a far more reliable indicator of age discrimination than is the fact that the plaintiff was replaced by someone outs…” | 83 |
| 2 | O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. | green | “cannot be drawn from the replacement of one worker with another worker insignificantly younger.” | 76 |
| 3 | James A. RICHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOOK-SUPERX, INC. and Revco D.S., Inc., Defendants-Appellees | green | “a plaintiff must show that he was replaced by someone 'substantially younger,' although not necessarily outside the protected class.” | 6 |
| 4 | Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. Garcia | green | “garcia could establish the fourth element of a prima facie age discrimination claim by showing that she was terminated because of her age, regardless of whether she was replaced by someone younger.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.