3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commissioner v. Sunnen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commissioner v. Sunnen Anchor | green | “under th rules of claim preclusion, the effect of a judgment extends to the litigation of all issues relevant to the same claim between the same parties, whether or not raised at trial.” | 3 |
| 2 | Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-Appellee | green | “a judgment on the merits operates as a bar to the later suit, even though a different legal theory of recovery is advanced in the second suit” | 3 |
| 3 | Howe v. Vaughan | green | “the law of this circuit is well-settled that a plan is binding upon all parties once it is confirmed and all questions that could have been raised pertaining to such plan are res judicata.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.