Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lassiter v. Poss.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lassiter v. Poss Anchor | green | “reasonable minds might disagree as to whether the fender of an automobile is such an obvious place of danger under all circumstances that a person sitting thereon would be barred from recovery as a matter of law,” | 4 |
| 2 | Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. LaRoche | green | “was authorized to conclude from the evidence that southern bell had installed the telephone in a negligent manner, it being common knowledge that a heavy object such as a pay telephone cannot be securely fastened to a particle board wall by ordinary wood screws.” | 3 |
| 3 | Little Rapids Corp. v. McCamy | green | “assumption of risk does not extend to assuming the negligent act of another.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.