5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 413 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Campbell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services Anchor | green | “like any norm based upon common sense and experience, this rule should not be treated as an absolute and must yield where the factual predicates for its application are weak or lacking” | 217 |
| 2 | Doe/70 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services | green | “iven the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and his contemporaneous medical records, the special master's decision to rely on petitioner's medical records was rational and consistent with applicable law” | 173 |
| 3 | Doe/70 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services | green | “given the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and his contemporaneous medical records, the special master's decision to rely on petitioner's medical records was rational and consistent with applicable law.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.