Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. Colton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. Colton Anchor | green | “the substance of a disclosure has already been revealed but not its source.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Pape | green | “situations in which so much has already appeared of the actual communications between an attorney and a client, that the disclosure of the client will result in a breach of the privilege.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.