Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 13 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peters Griffin Woodward, Inc. v. WCSC, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peters Griffin Woodward, Inc. v. WCSC, Inc. Anchor | green | “money, if specifically identifiable, may be the subject of a conversion action” | 4 |
| 2 | Melnikow v. Northland Group, Inc. | green | “where the original possession is lawful, a conversion does not occur until the defendant refuses to return the property after demand” | 3 |
| 3 | Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Chemical Bank | green | “is an obligation that the law creates, in the absence of any agreement, when and because the acts of the parties or others have placed in the possession of one party money . . . under such circumstances that in equity and good conscience the party ought not to retain it” | 3 |
| 4 | MCC Proceeds, Inc. v. Advest, Inc. | green | “obviously suspicious that no honest person (not just a reasonably prudent person) could turn a blind eye thereto,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.