Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Whipple.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Whipple Anchor | green | “the record establishes that defendant confirmed the accuracy of supreme court's recitation of the facts underlying the crime, and contrary to his contention, there is no requirement that he personally recite those facts” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Mobley | green | “he failed to request a probable cause hearing or to raise that contention at the huntley hearing” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Brown | neutral | “defendant did not challenge the predicate felony statement submitted by the people pursuant to cpl 400.21 and may not challenge his second felony offender status for the first time on appeal” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.