Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Stephen A. Knox.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Stephen A. Knox Anchor | green | “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area' of a minor necessarily requires only that the material depict some 'sexually explicit conduct' by the minor subject which appeals to the lascivious interest of the intended audience.” | 5 |
| 2 | Terry S. Fischl v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation | green | “although the 'starting point in any case involving statutory construction must be the language employed by congress', we may examine the relevant legislative history of a particular statute in order to ensure that its literal application fulfills manifest congressional intent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.