Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLC Anchor | green | “condition precedent' is a legal term of art with a clear meaning: 'an act or event, other than a lapse of time, that must exist or occur before a duty to perform something promised arises.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Big Rivers Electric Corp. | green | “kentucky law clearly holds that if a condition precedent is not satisfied, the contract in question is not enforceable.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.