Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 153 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bennett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bennett Anchor | green | “the elements of first-degree murder are (1) the intentional killing of a human (2) with premeditation and deliberation.” | 51 |
| 2 | People v. Ericksen | green | “we examine the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, resolving all evidentiary conflicts in its favor, and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proved beyond reasonable doubt.” | 40 |
| 3 | People v. Dunigan | green | “not interfere with the jury's assessment of the weight and credibility of witnesses or the evidence.” | 32 |
| 4 | People v. Ericksen | green | “we review de novo a challenge on appeal to the sufficiency of the evidence.” | 22 |
| 5 | People of Michigan v. Benjamin Keith McKewen | green | “with regard to an actor's intent, because of the difficulties inherent in proving an actor's state of mind, minimal circumstantial evidence is sufficient.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.