Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Sheena D..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Sheena D. Anchor | green | “family court act 1056 (1) prohibits the issuance of an order of protection that exceeds the duration of any other dispositional order in the case” | 4 |
| 2 | In re Leeann S. | green | “the record supports the determination of the court that respondent's sexual abuse of kimberly demonstrated fundamental flaws in his understanding of the duties of parenthood and warranted a finding of derivative neglect with respect to the other children” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.