2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp. Anchor | green | “plaintiffs are free to use alternative means of injecting precision and some measure of substantiation into their allegations of fraud” | 4 |
| 2 | PHP Liquidating, LLC v. Robbins (In Re PHP Healthcare Corp.) | green | “we need not discuss the provisions of the delaware fraudulent transfer act . . . because they are substantially the same as the relevant parts of the bankruptcy code.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.