Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mountain Top Beverage Group, Inc. v. Wildlife Brewing N.B., Inc. James Sorenson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mountain Top Beverage Group, Inc. v. Wildlife Brewing N.B., Inc. James Sorenson Anchor | green | “calculate the guideline range as they would have done prior to booker , but then sentence defendants by taking into account all of the relevant factors of 18 u.s.c. 3553 , as well as the guidelines range.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Richard Hough (00-3380) Lamont Needum (00-3381) Anthony Gibbs (00-3417) Chad Gibbs (00-3434) Antwan Woods (00-3592) | green | “this court has declined to require that enhancements imposed pursuant to the guidelines be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt as long as the sentence imposed does not exceed the statutory maximum.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.