Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Steel Division v. Anne B. Gorsuch, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Steel Division v. Anne B. Gorsuch, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Anchor | green | “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board | green | “need not respond to every comment, but it must 'respond in a reasoned manner to the comments received, to explain how the agency resolved any significant problems raised by the comments, and to show how that resolution led the agency to the ultimate rule.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.