2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weinstein v. Islamic Republic of Iran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weinstein v. Islamic Republic of Iran Anchor | green | “efault judgments under the fsia require additional findings than in the case of ordinary default judgments.” | 5 |
| 2 | Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States | green | “efault judgments under the fsia require additional findings than in the case of ordinary default judgments.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.