Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 142 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Perez Acevedo v. Rivero Cubano.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perez Acevedo v. Rivero Cubano Anchor | green | “is treated much like a rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.” | 56 |
| 2 | Aponte-Torres v. University of Puerto Rico | green | “implicates the pleadings as a whole.” | 27 |
| 3 | Aponte-Torres v. University of Puerto Rico | green | “a rule 12(c) motion, unlike a rule 12(b)(6) motion, implicates the pleadings as a whole.” | 23 |
| 4 | Perez Acevedo v. Rivero Cubano | green | “a complaint must contain factual allegations that 'raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true.” | 20 |
| 5 | R.G. Financial Corp. v. Vergara-Nuñez | green | “calls for an assessment of the merits of the case at an embryonic stage, the court must view the facts contained in the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and draw all reasonable inferences therefrom to the nonmovant's behoof.” | 9 |
| 6 | NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton | green | “based solely on the factual allegations in the complaint and answer.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.