Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 139 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Janet Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Janet Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach Anchor | green | “to be sure, feliciano's sworn statements are self-serving, but that alone does not permit us to disregard them at the summary judgment stage.” | 57 |
| 2 | United States v. Estelle Stein | green | “a litigant's self-serving statements based on personal knowledge or observation can defeat summary judgment.” | 39 |
| 3 | Smith v. Lockheed Martin Corp. | green | “so long as the circumstantial evidence raises a reasonable inference that the employer discriminated against the plaintiff, summary judgment is improper.” | 30 |
| 4 | United States v. Estelle Stein | green | “an affidavit which satisfies rule 56 of the federal rules of civil procedure may create an issue of material fact and preclude summary judgment even if it is self-serving and uncorroborated.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.