Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reel v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reel v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “at a hearing on a defendant's motion to suppress, the commonwealth has the burden of proving that a warrantless search or seizure did not violate the defendant's fourth amendment rights.” | 5 |
| 2 | Motley v. Commonwealth | green | “it, however, is well established that, on appeal, appellant carries the burden to show, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the commonwealth, that the denial of a motion to suppress constitutes reversible error.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.