Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reagan v. Vaughn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reagan v. Vaughn Anchor | green | “the defenses which bar all or part of the injured parent's recovery have the same effect on the child's recovery.” | 4 |
| 2 | Howard v. Fiesta Texas Show Park, Inc. | green | “claims for loss of consortium and loss of services are derivative of the injured family member's cause of action for personal injuries and are subject to the same statute of limitations and defenses that preclude liability.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.