Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. Anchor | green | “it is well settled that the requirement of a timely notice of appeal is 'mandatory and jurisdictional.” | 39 |
| 2 | Luther Williams, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | green | “this court typically will not review remand orders by the court of appeals for veterans claims 'because they are not final judgments.” | 6 |
| 3 | Luther Williams, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | green | “typically will not review remand orders by the cavc 'because they are not final judgments.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.