Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 138 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Cortez Rogers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Cortez Rogers Anchor | green | “all non-mandatory conditions of supervised release must be announced at a defendant's sentencing hearing.” | 34 |
| 2 | United States v. Christopher Singletary | green | “in order to sentence a defendant to a non-mandatory condition of supervised release, the sentencing court must include that condition in its oral pronouncement of a defendant's sentence in open court.” | 27 |
| 3 | United States v. Christopher Singletary | green | “discretionary conditions that appear for the first time in a subsequent written judgment . . . are nullities; the defendant has not been sentenced to those conditions, and a remand for resentencing is required.” | 24 |
| 4 | United States v. Cortez Rogers | green | “a district court may satisfy its obligation to orally pronounce discretionary conditions through incorporation-by incorporating, for instance, all guidelines 'standard' conditions when it pronounces a supervised-release sentence, and then detailing those conditions in the writte…” | 22 |
| 5 | United States v. Robert Cisson | green | “a defendant claims that a district court committed a rogers error, we review the consistency of the defendant's oral sentence and the written judgment de novo.” | 17 |
| 6 | United States v. Christopher Singletary | green | “a district court must orally pronounce all non-mandatory conditions of supervised release at the sentencing hearing.” | 8 |
| 7 | United States v. Robert Cisson | green | “that it would impose the 'mandatory and standard conditions' of supervised release.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.