Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 133 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wegener v. Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wegener v. Johnson Anchor | green | “the reason for noncompliance, the surprise and prejudice to the opposing party, the extent to which allowing the information or testimony would disrupt the order and efficiency of the trial, and the importance of the information or testimony.” | 53 |
| 2 | Wegener v. Johnson | green | “the district court has wide discretion to fashion a remedy or sanction as appropriate for the particular circumstances of the case.” | 46 |
| 3 | Timothy Vanderberg v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores | green | “the disclosure mandates in rule 26 are given teeth by the threat of sanctions in rule 37.” | 19 |
| 4 | Michael D. Trost v. Trek Bicycle Corporation | green | “failure to disclose in a timely manner is equivalent to failure to disclose” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.